Research Progress on Stability of Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures, and the core of treatment decisions lies in accurate judgment of fracture stability. However, the definition and evaluation criteria for stability have not yet been unified. This article systematically reviews the relevant literature on the stability of distal radius fractures. Although the classic Lafontaine criterion is widely used, its predictive power is controversial; the revised model developed by Dissanewate et al. emphasizes quantitative indicators such as age stratification and radius shortening, showing better discriminatory ability. At the same time, various studies have proposed more different prediction methods. Although existing classification systems and prediction models provide important basis for clinical judgment, stability assessment of distal radius fractures is a multi-dimensional process, and further high-quality research is needed to verify and optimize existing standards.