Psychosocial Factors Influencing Voting Behavior

Authors

  • Pradeep Kumar Anand Research Scholar, Department of Psychology, Sri Venkateswara University Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh State, India
  • Srikanth Reddy Research Supervisor, Former Professor Department of Psychology, Sri Venkateswara University Tirupati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(10).28

Keywords:

voting behavior, Indian electorate, psycho-social factors, personality traits, electoral participation

Abstract

This study delves into the voting behaviour in the context of Indian electorate, shedding light on understanding it in the relatively new dimension, where the focus is primarily on psychological factors and social factors (demography) influencing the voting behaviour, which further sheds light on understanding the broader issues, like low voter turnout in India compared to other democracies worldwide, understanding of opinion polls and exit surveys and other evolving unethical Influences which are centred around mental process of voters cognition, which could create a new dimension of understanding the need for neuro rights of the voters, where the motive of free and fair elections can be achieved. This pioneering attempt to comprehend the psycho - social factors influencing voting behaviour in the Indian electoral system is groundbreaking as it has never been attempted before. In an election scenario, voters are exposed to a myriad of stimuli related to political candidates, parties, promises, and discussions, prompting selective exposure, perception, and integration processes to form the basis for their voting decisions. The study also draws on the voter turnout theory, highlighting the role of social reference groups and their impact on voter behaviour. Furthermore, it emphasizes the under explored domain of psychological and social factors in explaining political attitudes and voting behaviour among the mass public from relative unexplored dimensions, asserting that psychological traits directly influence the voting behaviour. With the Indian electoral system becoming increasingly dynamic due to diverse societal participation and steadily growing influential factors the need for study arises strongly, This research attempt is being carried forward by examining personality through the DISC personality assessment tool and quantifying the voting behaviour through the theory of planned behaviour questionnaire, the study seeks to discern the connections between demographic variables, personality traits and voting behaviour (intention). The components of voting behaviour were formed on the pivotals of theory of planned behaviour (TBH) such as behaviour beliefs, control beliefs and normative beliefs which more precisely create assessment area of voting behaviour intention. The study employs questionnaire with a five - point Likert scale to measure respondents' agreement with statements related to voting behaviour. The research's objectives include exploring the influence of a voter's personality and demographic variables on their voting behaviour and the influence of specific personality types on various facets of voting behaviour. The study's hypotheses posit that voting behaviour is influenced by psycho - social factors, particularly personality and demographic variables, and that different personality types may alternatively influence the voting behaviour intention. In conclusion, this study aims to elevate our comprehension of this context to a higher standard.

References

"Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission". Everything Disc personality assessment tool.

Ajzen, I. From intention to action: A theory of planned behaviour In J. Kuhl and J. Beckman (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognitions to Behaviours 1985, New York, NY: Springer.

Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behaviour, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1991. pp.179 - 211.

Ajzen I. Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations Available at http: //www.people. umass. edu/aizen/. Accessed October 2007.

Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen. Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. In: G.

M. Stephenson & J. M. Davis (eds.), Progress in Applied Social Psychology, 1981. (London, Wiley) pp.253 - 313.

Cass O. A., A. Pecotich. The dynamics of voter behavior and influence processes in electoral markets: a consumer behavior perspective Journal of Business Research, 2005 pp.406 - 413.

Bentler, P. M. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin Psychological Bulletin 1992. – 112 pp.400 - 404.

Watters, A. E. Reasoned/intuitive action: An individual difference moderator of the attitude - behaviour relationship in the 1988 US presidential election. unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1989.

Schram, A., J. Sonnemans. Why people vote: Experimental evidence // Journal of Economic Psychology, 1996. – pp.417 - 442.

Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen. Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. In: G.

M. Stephenson & J. M. Davis (eds.), Progress in Applied Social Psychology, 1981. (London, Wiley) pp.253 - 313.

Ajzen, I. From intention to action: A theory of planned behaviour // In J. Kuhl and J. Beckman (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognitions to Behaviours 1985, New York, NY: Springer.

Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behaviour, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1991. 50. pp.179 - 211.

Ajzen I. Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations Available athttp:

//www.people. umass. edu/aizen/. Accessed October 2007.

Anderson, J. C., D. W. Gerbing. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two - step approach Psychological Bulletin 1988.103 (3). pp.411 - 423.

Bentler, P. M. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin Psychological Bulletin 1992. – 112 pp.400 - 404.

Bettman, J. R., M. F. Luce, J. W. Payne. Constructive Consumer Choice Processes Journal of Consumer Research, 1998.25 (December). pp.187 - 217.

Bollen K. A., J. S. Long. Testing Structural Equation Models. London SAGE Publications 1993.

Burton, S., R. Netemeyer. The effect of enduring, situational, and response involvement on preference stability in the context of voting behavior Psychology & Marketing, 1992.9 (2). pp.143 - 156.

Carmines, E., J. McIver. Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures In G. Bohrnstedt and E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues, Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage 1981.

Cass O. A., A. Pecotich. The dynamics of voter behavior and influence processes in electoral markets: a consumer behavior perspective Journal of Business Research, 2005.58. – pp.406 - 413.

Chang, M. K. Predicting Unethical Behaviour: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behaviour Journal of Business Ethics, 1998. – 17. pp.1825 - 1834.

Claeys, C., P. Swinnen, A. P. Vanden. Consumers’ means - end chains for “think” and “feel” products International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1995. – 12. pp.193 - 208.

Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1947.

Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1975.

Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen. Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. In: G.

M. Stephenson & J. M. Davis (eds.), Progress in Applied Social Psychology, 1981.1 (London, Wiley) pp.253 - 313.

Fornell, C., D. F. Larcker. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error Journal of Marketing Research, 1981. – 18 pp.77 - 90.

Frambach, R. T., J. Prabhu, T. M. M. Verhallen. The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2003.20 pp.377 - 397.

Getman, J., S. B. Golberg, J. B. Herman. Union Representation Election: Law and reality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.

Gutman, J. Means - End Model based on consumer categorisation processes Journal of Marketing, 1982. – 46. pp.60 - 72.

Hair J., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, W. C. Black. Multivariate Data Analysis. Fifth ed., Prentice - Hall, New Jersey, 1998.

Hansen, T., J. M. Jensen, H. S. Solgaard. Predicting online grocery buying intention: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour International Journal of Information Management, 2004. –24 (December). pp.539 - 550.

Hansen, T. Perspectives on Consumer Decision Making: An Integrated Approach Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2005.4 (6). – pp.420 - 437.

Hawkins, D. I., R. J. Best, K. A. Coney. Consumer Behaviour: Building Marketing Strategy Irwin McGraw

- Hill, 8th ed, 2001.

Jensen, H. R. Antecedents and consequences of consumer value assessments: implications for marketing strategy and future research Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2002. – 8. pp.299 - 310.

Jöreskog, K. G. A General Method for Analysis of Covariance Structures, Biometrika, 1970. – 57. pp.239

- 251.

Locke, E. A., E. Fredrick, P. Bobko, C. Lee. Effect of self - efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performances Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984. – 69 pp.241 - 251.

Olson, J., R. Reynolds. Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: Implications for advertising strategy. In: L. Percy and A. Woodside (Eds.), Advertising and consumer psychology, Vol.1, MA, Lexington Books, 1983.

IPAT (2009).16PF fifth edition questionnaire manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

Kiesler, D. J., Schmidt, J. A., & Wagner, C. C. (1997). A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotion and interpersonal behavior. In R. Plutchik & H. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2010). NEO inventories: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Wiggins, J. S. (1995). Interpersonal adjective scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Anand, P. K., & Reddy, S. (2024). Psychosocial Factors Influencing Voting Behavior. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(10), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(10).28