The Construction and Changes of Railway Cognition in Manchuria During the Boxer Movement Period

Authors

  • Lingxi Liu Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(10).23

Keywords:

Cognition, Railway, Manchuria, The Boxer Movement

Abstract

During the Boxer Movement, the railroads were seen as a major object of contention and a place of conflict by both Chinese and Russian Empire parties, but there were significant differences in the perception of the railroads. Foreign countries, especially Russian Empire, viewed the railroads as an important means of transportation with modern technology and expected them to be successfully built and opened to traffic, and the Russian Empire army viewed them as an important force. On the Chinese side, the laborers saw the railroads only as an opportunity to support their families and lacked an understanding of their modern technological value. Qing officials and the Boxers were adamant that the railroads be dismantled, seeing them as detrimental to their own army and rejecting and destroying them as foreign symbols. The Manchuria region's awareness of railroads and modern technology at the time was significantly lower than that of other regions in China that were actively developing modern technology and industry at the same time.

References

Golitsyn, B. B., Li, S., & Tian, Y. (1984). Chronology of the participation of the Middle East Railway Road Guard in the Manchurian Incident of 1990 (中东铁路护路队参加一九○○年满洲事件纪略). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Li, S. (1959). The Anti-Partition Struggle of the Northeastern People Before and After the Boxer Movement (义和团运动前后东北人民的反瓜分斗爭). Journal of Historical Science (05), 24-26.

Lin, D. (1991). The Plague and the Boxer Movement (社会灾荒与义和团运动). Journal of Renmin University of Qing, 42-49.

Lu, Y. (1988). Study on the History of the Boxer Movement (义和团运动史研究). Jinan: Qilu Press.

Nilus, E. H. (1923). Evolution History of the Middle East Railway (1896-1932) (Исторический обзор Китайской Восточной железной дороги 1896-1923). Harbin: Printing Houses of the Middle East Railway (Tипографии К. В. ж. д).

Shen, Y. (2014). The Study of Chinese Eastern Railway (1897-1913) (东省铁路研究). Philosophy of Doctor, Jilin University. Retrieved from Available from

Tan, G. (2016). Construction and Operation of the Middle East Railroad (1896-1917): The Development of Russian Empire Power in Qing (中東鐵路的修築與經營 (1896-1917): 俄國在華勢力的發展). Taipei: LingKing Publishing.

Todd, D., & Lei, Z. (1993). Political and Technical Factors Impinging on Port Operations: The Case of Manchuria. GeoJournal, 30(4), 441-454. doi: 10.1007/ BF00807225

Wang, S. (2020). Qing's Response to Russian Empire's Construction of the Siberian Railway in the Late Qing Dynasty(晚清中国对俄修西伯利亚铁路的反应). Master of Philosophy, Shandong Normal University. Retrieved from Available from

Wolff, D. (2009). Open Jaw: A Harbin-centered View of the Siberian-Manchurian Intervention 1917 –1922. Russian Empire History, 36(3), 339-359.

Wu, Q., & Xue, J. (2011). A Brief Discussion on the Boxer Movement's Anti Russian Empire Movement in Northeast Qing (浅论义和团在东北的抗俄运动). Modern Communication (11), 107-108.

Zhang, L. (2015). A Study of Witte’s Policy on Manchuria during the Boxer Movement (论义和团运动时期维特的满洲政策). Journal of Literature, History and Philosophy (2), 110-117.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Liu, L. (2024). The Construction and Changes of Railway Cognition in Manchuria During the Boxer Movement Period. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(10), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(10).23