Research on the Intercultural Communication of the Programme Informal Talks from the Perspective of Interactive Linguistics

Authors

  • Tianmin Qian College of Humanities and Foreign Languages, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(09).37

Keywords:

Intercultural communication, Evaluative stance, Conversational pattern

Abstract

This paper is based on authentic spoken data from the Programme Informal Talks and employs an interactional communication perspective to analyze the conversational patterns and sequential environments presented in the corpus. It aims to reveal the discourse representations in a cross-cultural context and to explore the interaction mechanisms between conversational patterns and socio-cultural factors, when communicators express differing stances, they may employ various conversational patterns that correspond to the content of the discourse, the appropriateness of the discourse, and the expression of negative emotional attitudes. When targeting the content of the discourse, negation can be conveyed through articulating opposing views, rejecting established social norms, or negating implicit meanings. When addressing the appropriateness of the discourse, subsequent statements often reflect the speaker’s need for specific clarification, which may involve challenging the authority of the knowledge presented.

References

Auer Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text, 25 (1):7-36.

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.) Stance-taking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139-182. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Heritage John. 2012. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1):30-52.

Heritage John. 2013. Epistemics in conversation. In Jack Sidnell &. Tanya Stivers (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 370-394. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Womam, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gumperz, J.J. Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective[A]. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, &H.E. Hamilton(eds), The handbook of Discourse Analysis[C]. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cui Xiliang. The 12 Key Research Fields of International Chinese Language Education[J]. International Chinese Language Education, 2023, 8(01):3-12.

Fang Mei. On conventionalization of negative assessment expressions[J]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 2017, 377(02):131-147+254.

Zhao Yang. Intersubjectivity Research on International Chinese Language Education from the Perspective of “Self” and “Others”[J]. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, 2021, 32(05):170-176.

Li Quan. On Country Specialization of Chinese Language Textbooks[J]. Chinese Teaching in the World, 2015, 29(04):526-540.

Z.W. Zhang, J.N. Wang: Crane Design Manual (China Railway Press, China 1998), p.683-685.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

Qian, T. (2024). Research on the Intercultural Communication of the Programme Informal Talks from the Perspective of Interactive Linguistics. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(9), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(09).37