Fostering Inclusivity: Revealing Law Enforcement's Stance on Gay and Bisexual Men in the Police Force
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.06(07).24Keywords:
Gender diversity, Law enforcement, Gay and Bisexual Men, Attitudes, Police ForceAbstract
Gender diversity in the workplace, particularly in law enforcement agencies, continues to be a significant concern for many organizations. Law enforcement agencies have come under particular scrutiny regarding their inclusivity practices within the public sector. This study aims to investigate the attitudes of law enforcement personnel towards the inclusion of gay and bisexual men in the police force, utilizing a descriptive research design. A survey was conducted among 413 randomly selected police officers in Baguio City to gather their opinions on this matter. The survey results revealed that the police officers neither agree nor disagree with including gay and bisexual men in the police force. This neutral response suggests a lack of strong or definitive opinions regarding the issue. It may indicate uncertainty, a need for further awareness, or potential openness to the idea of inclusivity. The findings underscore the importance of addressing gender diversity concerns in law enforcement and emphasize the need for educational initiatives to foster a more inclusive and equitable environment within the police force. By understanding the current attitudes of law enforcement personnel, this research serves as a foundation for future interventions and training programs to promote a more diverse and supportive police force, where all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation, can contribute to public safety effectively.
References
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook[M]. Oxford: Heinemann.
David C. Berliner. (2002). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 32(4): 31-40.
Engstrom Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mil lvalley, CA: Sociological Press.
Graves Kathleen. (2019). Recent books on language materials development and analysis. ELT Journal, (3): 12-21
Leont'ev, A. N (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Marwan A & Sweeney T. (2019). Using Activity Theory to Analyze Contradictions in English
Teachers' Technology Integration. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2): 115-125.
Miles, M. & A. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richards, J. (1998). "Textbooks: help or hindrance in teaching" in J. Richards, Beyond Training: Perspectives on Teacher Education? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second Language Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Strauss, A. J. Corbin. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Davies Kipkorir Bett, Dennis Juma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.