Linguistic Labyrinths and Madness in John Fowles' the Magicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jrve.2024.6(11).06Keywords:
Labyrinth, Metafiction, Intertextuality, mise en abyme, Authorship, The Magus, MadnessAbstract
This study aims to examine and analyse the role of intertextuality in John Fowles' The Magus (1965). As this work provides an introductory overview of intertextuality, in lights to Fowles' use of inspiration and direct quotation from T. S. Eliot's "Little Gidding. " An evident through tracing to the chain of influence of other pre - existing works in the world of literature and in its opposition towards the traditional aspects of originality, authorial voice and fixed meaning. The Magus constructs a labyrinth narrative world, where it invites readers to stroll around the maze in pursuit of no definite truth. In addition, through Conchis, Fowles blurs reality and illusion, pushing Nicholas into a state of madness, paranoia and existential crises. As Michel Foucault suggests, madness in literature symbolizes self - examination, and Conchis' surreal scenarios vigorously forces Nicholas to question his sanity and acknowledge his inner chaos. Nicholas' journey through madness reveals deeper truths about human nature, highlighting the fragility of identity and the struggle to discern reality from illusion.
References
Alfaro, M. J. M. (1996). Intertextuality: Origins and Development of the Concept. Atlantis, 18 (1/2), 268– 285.
Allen, G. (2022). Intertextuality (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Aryan, A. (July 2019). The Traumatised Shaman: The Woman Writer in the Age of Globalised Trauma. Alluvium (special issue). https: //alluvium. bacls. org/2019/07/01/the - traumatised - shaman - the - woman - writer - in - the - age - of - globalised - trauma/
Aryan, A. (2020). The Post - war Novel and the Death of the Author. Palgrave Macmillan. Aryan, A. (2021). Fiction as Therapy: Agency and Authorship in Samuel Beckett's The Unnamable, Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9 (1), 107 - 123. https: //exchanges. warwick. ac. uk/index. php/exchanges/article/view/428
Aryan, A. (2022). The Postmodern Representation of Reality in Peter Ackroyd's Chatterton. New Castle UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Aryan, A. (2023). The Literary Critic and Creative Writer as Antagonists: Golding's The Paper Men. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 25 (3), 338 - 353.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image - Music - Text (S. Heath, Ed. & Trans.). Fontana Press.
Berthold - Bond, D. (1991). Hegel, Nietzsche, and Freud on Madness and the Unconscious. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 5 (3), 193–213.
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795.
Foucault, M. (2023). Madness, Language, Literature. H. Fruchaud, D. Lorenzini, & J. Revel, Eds.; R. Bononno (Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Fowles, J. (1965). The Magus (1st ed.). Little Brown and Company.
Fowles, J. (1977). The Magus: A Revised Version. Little Brown & Company.
Hutcheon, L. (1988). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction (Digital Printing ed.). Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Word, Dialogue and Novel. In Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Eds.). Columbia University Press.
Laing, R. D. (1960). The Divided Self: A Study of Sanity and Madness. Routledge.
Rommerskirchen, B. (1999). Constructing Reality: Constructivism and Narrative in John Fowles's The Magus. Peter Lang.
Rubenstein, R., & Fowles, J. (1975). Myth, Mystery, and Irony: John Fowles's The Magus. Contemporary Literature, 16 (3), 328–339.
Sass, Louis A. (1992). Madness and Modernism: Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought. BasicBooks.
Sass, Louis A. (1995). The Paradoxes of Delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the Schizophrenic Mind. Cornell University Press.
von Glasersfeld, E. (Summer 1977). Review: Reflections on John Fowles's The Magus and the Construction of Reality. The Georgia Review, Vol.33, No.2, pp.444 - 448.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jrutyunjay Seetaram Padhiary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
