Comparative Analysis of Seismic Design Standards for Structures and Safety Standards for High-rise Concrete Building Structures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jpce.2024.06(10).01Keywords:
Seismic Analysis, I.S 16700:2017, I.S 1893(Part I):2016, Base shear, DisplacementAbstract
The core of this study is the comparative analysis of I S. 1893 (Part One): 2016 Edition (Code for Seismic Design of Structures) and I S. 16700:2017 (Code for Safety of High rise Concrete Building Structures). In addition, the study aims to uncover the key factors that contribute to poor performance of buildings in earthquakes, with the aim of improving the safety performance of structures in earthquakes in the future. As a research case, we selected a specific reinforced concrete moment shelving frame (SMRF) building at Jabalpur Airport. The building structure was modeled and analyzed using SAPpro V20i software. According to software calculations, we obtained the time history analysis results of the structure in two directions and ensured that they comply with the two Indian standards mentioned above. Subsequently, by comparing the structural responses under the two standards, we evaluated the significant differences in foundation shear force, displacement, and mass participation. The research results indicate that compared to I S. 1893 (Part One): 2016, following I S. The performance of the 16700:2017 structure in earthquakes is relatively poor.
References
Urunkar S.S.,etc(2018), “Comparative study of codal provisions in IS 1893(Part I):2002 and IS 1893 ( Part 1):2016”, IJARSE-vol.07,issue 01, March-2018.
Sergo Hampshire Dec. Santos, etc (2013), “Comparative study of codes for seismic design of structures”, Mathematical Modelling in civil engineering vol.9-No. 1-2013.
Mehul J.Bhavasar, etc (2014), “Comparative study of typical RC building using Indian standards and Euro standards under seismic forces”, International Journal of scientific and research publications, Vol.4, Issue 12, Des.2014.
Prakash Channappagoudar, etc (2018), “Parametric comparison study on the performance of building under lateral loads as per IS 875(Part 3):1987 and IS 875(Part 3):2015”, IRJET-vol.05,issue-05,May-2018.
Amit B. Anwade, etc (2018), “ Seismic Analysis, Design and Comparative study of RC structure using different codes”, IRJET-Vol.05,Issue:04,Apr-2018.
Rachel Bashor, etc (2009) - ”The Comparative Study of Major International Codes”-. The Seventh Asia- Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 2009, Taipei, Taiwan.
Angelo Masi,etc(2008), “A Parametric Study On Rc Existing Buildings To Compare Different Analysis Methods Considered In The european Seismic Code (Ec8-3)”, The 14thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.
Semih S. Tezcan,etc(2001), “Parametric analysis of irregular structures under seismic loading according to the new Turkish Earthquake Code”, ELSEVIER, Engineering Structures 23 (2001) 600–609.
Mehul J.Bhavasar, etc (2014), “Comparative study of typical RC building using Indian standards and Euro standards under seismic forces”, International Journal of scientific and research publications, Vol.4, Issue 12, Des.2014.
Prakash Channappagoudar, etc (2018), “Parametric comparison study on the performance of building under lateral loads as per IS 875(Part 3):1987 and IS 875(Part 3):2015”, IRJET-vol.05,issue-05,May-2018.
Amit B. Anwade, etc (2018), “ Seismic Analysis, Design and Comparative study of RC structure using different codes”, IRJET-Vol.05,Issue:04,Apr-2018.
Rachel Bashor, etc (2009) -The ”Comparitive Study of Major International Codes ”-. The Seventh Asia- Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8- 12, 2009, Taipei, Taiwan.
Vineetpalankar, etc(2018)- ” Parametric Comparison study on the performance of building under lateral loads As per I.S.875 ( part III ) :1987 and I.S. 875 ( Part III) : 2015 ” –IRJET, Vol.2, May2018.
CramenBukur,etc(2013)- ” Comparative Study of codes for seismic Design“– Mathematical modeling in Civil engineer, Vol.9-2013.
Ioannis P. Giannopoulos (2009), “Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8”, 16ο Σσν?δριο Σκσροδ?ματο?, ΤΕΕ, ΕΤΕΚ, 21-23/10/ 2009.
Balthasar Novák, K. Ramanjaneyulu,etc (2011)-, “Comparison of Seismic Performance of D-region of Existing RC Structures Designed with Different Recommendations”.- Seismic analysis conference,Delhi-May2011.
YihaWassie (2011),“A comparative study of the seismic provisions of ebcs-8 and current major building codes on the equivalent lateral force analysis and dynamic response spectrum analysis”.- Seismic analysis conference,Delhi-May2011.
P.R. Bose, R. Dubey & M.A. Yazdi (1992), “Comparison of codal provisions suggested by various countries”, Earthquake Engineering, Tenth World Conference? 1992 Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 060 5:5747-5750.
“IS: 1893 (part 1) : 2002”, Indian Standard “Criteria for Earthquake Resistance design of structures”,“Part-I General provision and buildings, (Fifth Revision)”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, June 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdihakim Osman Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
