Comparative Cost‑Benefit Analysis of Precast Versus Conventional Masonry Construction

Authors

  • Paula Lucas Pereira da Silva UNA University Center - Bom Despacho, Abaeté - Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Ferreira Rodrigues Sávio Loureiro UNA University Center - Bom Despacho, Abaeté - Minas Gerais, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66069/ojspub.214122808

Keywords:

Conventional masonry, Precast construction, Budget comparison, Construction time

Abstract

Selecting the optimal construction method is critical for balancing financial efficiency and project timelines in civil engineering. This study compares the cost‑effectiveness of conventional masonry versus precast concrete construction through a mixed‑method approach: an explanatory literature review and an exploratory budget comparison based on updated data from a real‑world project, including modeling of costs and execution schedules using Excel. Results indicate that precast construction offers superior time efficiency; however, stage‑specific cost variations necessitate a granular analysis to determine the overall optimal choice. These findings provide practical guidance for project managers and decision‑makers in selecting construction systems that align with project‑specific financial and temporal constraints.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Silva, P. L. P. da, & Loureiro, F. R. S. (2026). Comparative Cost‑Benefit Analysis of Precast Versus Conventional Masonry Construction. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance, 8(8), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.66069/ojspub.214122808

Issue

Section

Articles

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /www/bryanhousepub/ojs/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49