Digital Economy Challenges and Opportunities in Malawi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jgebf.2025.07(02).07Keywords:
Challenges, Opportunities, Digital Economy, Critical analysis, MalawiAbstract
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and opportunities associated with the Digital Economy DE in Malawi, focusing on the Information Communication Technology ICT sector. The research highlights the potential of DE to foster innovation, but also underscores the limitations imposed by inadequate digital infrastructure and loss of information control. The study employs a qualitative approach, guided by the New Public Management NPM model, and includes interviews with senior public officers from various departments. The findings reveal that while DE offers numerous benefits to Malawi, these advantages are often overshadowed by the prevailing challenges. The study concludes with a call for the Government of Malawi and key stakeholders to devise strategies to mitigate these challenges, thereby maximizing the benefits of DE. The insights gleaned from this research contribute to the knowledge base required for effective DE implementation in Malawi.
References
Brands J, & Van W. J. (2019). Connected and fearful?Exploring fear of online financial crime, Internetbehaviour and their relationship. European Journal ofCriminology, 1, 1–22.
Bryman A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
Bukht R, & Heeks R. (2017). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the Digital Economy. Working Paper 68. Centre for DevelopmentInformatics, Manchester, University of Manchester, UK.
Creswell J. W. (2016). Essential skills for thequalitative researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell J. W. (2014). Research design: A qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ganichev N, & Koshovets O. (2021). Forcing theDigital economy: How will the structures of Digitalmarkets change as a result of the COVID - 19pandemic. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 32 (1), 11 - 22.
Hanna N. (2020). Assessing the digital economy: aims, frameworks, pilot, results and lessons. Journal ofInnovation and Entrepreneurship, 9 (16), 1 - 16.
Hoque Z. (2005). „Securing Institutional Legitimacy ororganizational Effectiveness? A Case Examining theimpact of Public Sector Reform Initiatives in anAustralian Local Authority‟, International Journal ofPublic Sector Management, 18 (4), 367 - 382.
Makoza F. (2022). Analysing Digital Economystrategy of Malawi against the Digital EconomyEcosystem Framework. https: //www.researchgate. net/publication/358413265 Working PaperICTD03/22.
Makoza M. (2013). The Level of E - governmentImplementation: Case of Malawi. Electronic Journal ofE - government, 11 (1): 268 - 279.
Mansell R. (2021). Adjusting to the digital: Societaloutcomes and consequences. Research Policy, 50, 1 -10.
Obong‟o S. O. (2009). International Journal of PublicManagement Review.10 (2) Implementation ofPerformance Contracting in Kenya.
Stake R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vyas V, &Jain P. (2021). Role of digital economy andtechnology adoption for financial inclusion in India. Indian Growth and Development Review, 14 (3), 302 -324.
World Bank. (2021) Malawi Economic Monitor: Investing in digital transformation. World BankMalawi Office, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Yoon S. (2018). Servicization with skill premium inthe digital economy. Journal of Korea Trade, 22 (1), 17- 35.
Zhao F, Wallis J, &Singh M. (2014). E - governmentdevelopment and the digital economy: A reciprocalrelationship. Internet Research, 25 (50), 734 - 766.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suresh L. Chitragar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
