Stakeholder Influence on Malawi's Digital Economy Strategy Execution

Authors

  • Nguyen Thanh Muu Doctor of Philosophy Candidate in Public Administration and Management, University of Malawi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jgebf.2025.07(02).06

Keywords:

Stakeholder Influence, Digital Transformation, Strategy Execution, Malawi Digital Economy, Public Administration

Abstract

This article explored the influence of key stakeholders on the execution of Malawi’s Digital Economy Strategy. Government of Malawi introduced the 2021 - 2026 Malawi Digital Economy Strategy (MDES) in February, 2021 through the National Planning Commission of Malawi (NPCM). The main objective of the MDES is to create inclusive wealth which offers Malawians access to a prosperous economy. The five years strategy aims at improving connectivity and improves internet access from 14% to 80% by the year 2026. In addition, the strategy aims at providing affordable internet by cutting out taxes. In the article, a qualitative approach was used, under the guidance of the Stakeholder theory. The researcher purposively sampled five (5) Senior Public Officers from the E- government Department, four (4) Senior Public Officers from Public Sector Reforms Management Department (PSRMD) and three (3) Senior Public Officers from the Ministry of Information (MoI). Data was collected through Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) and secondary sources. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the results. The results show that the key stakeholders play a very significance role in implementation of the MDES because they help in the achievement of the intended goals and objectives. However, this is somehow affected due to challenges such as: a lack of proper coordination and collaboration among the key stakeholders. The study results are of great significance in creating new knowledge which will assist in the effective implementation of the MDES.

References

Bryman A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

Creswell J.W. (Creswell, 2016). Essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.[3] Creswell J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th Ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Flak L, Rose J. (2005). Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to E-Government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01631

Klessova S, Thomas C, Engell S. (2022). “Structuring inter-organizational R&D projects: towards a better understanding of the project architecture as an interplay between activity coordination and knowledge integration”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 291-306, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.008.

Makoza F. (2022). Analysing Digital Economy strategy of Malawi against the Digital Economy Ecosystem Framework. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358413265 Working Paper ICTD03/22.

Malanga D. F. (2016). E - Government adoption, Implementation, benefits and challenges: The Malawian experience. University of Livingstonia, Mzuzu.

MDES(2021). Malawi’s Digital Economy Strategy (2021-2026), National Planning Commission of Malawi, Lilongwe.

Mori N. (2010). International Business & Economics Research Journal. Roles of Stakeholders in Strategic Decision-Making of Microfinance Organizations Vol 9, 7, 51 University of Agder, Norway

Saukko L, Aaltonen K, Haapasalo H. (2020). “Interorganizational collaboration challenges and preconditions in industrial engineering projects”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 999-1023, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0250.

Stake R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

UN Women report. 2021.

Yin R.K. (2014). A case study research: design and methods, (5th Ed.)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Muu, N. T. (2025). Stakeholder Influence on Malawi’s Digital Economy Strategy Execution. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance, 7(2), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.53469/jgebf.2025.07(02).06

Issue

Section

Articles