Comparison and Evaluation of TOEFL iBT and ESOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2024.06(09).26Keywords:
TOEFL iBT, ESOL Level 2, Speaking section, Test construction, Evaluation principlesAbstract
As two high-stake standardized tests, Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT) and Trinity College ESOL Skills for Life (ESOL) Level 2 have been internationally recognized and used to demonstrate candidates’ English ability in different skills. Drawing from diverse perspectives, this paper undertakes a comparative evaluation of the speaking sections of these two tests and aims to provide insights into how these exams structure their speaking components, the criteria used for evaluation, and how effectively they measure candidates' English communication skills and practical language abilities. By comparing these aspects, the paper presents the similarities and differences of the speaking assessments of the two testing systems and intends to contribute a deeper understanding within these globally recognized exams to educators, test developers, and candidates alike.
References
Alderson, J.C., Clapham, C. & Wall, D., 1995. Language test construction and evaluation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barkaoui, K. et al., 2013. Test-Takers’ Strategic Behaviors in Independent and Integrated Speaking Tasks. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), pp.304–324.
Farnsworth, T.L., 2013. An Investigation Into the Validity of the TOEFL iBT Speaking Test for International Teaching Assistant Certification. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(3), pp.274–291.
Fulcher, G., 2010. Practical language testing, London: Hodder Education.
Frost, K., Elder, C. & Wigglesworth, G., 2012. Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task: A discourse-based analysis of test takers’ oral performances. Language Testing, 29(3), pp.345–369.
Frost, Kellie; Clothier, Josh; Huisman Annemiek; Wigglesworth, Gillian et al., 2020. Responding to a TOEFL iBT integrated speaking task: Mapping task demands and test takers’ use of stimulus content. Language testing., 37(1), pp.133–155.
Geranpayeh, A., 2000. Language proficiency testing: a comparative analysis of IELTS and TOEFL.
Hughes, A., 2003. Testing for language teachers Second., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hsu, H.-L. & Davidson, Fred, 2012. The impact of world Englishes on language assessment: Rater attitude, rating behavior, and challenges, pp.ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Messick, S., 1989. Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), pp.5-11.
Rivera, C., 1984. Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment : research and application, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Weir, C.J., 1993. Understanding and developing language tests, New York ; London: Prentice Hall.
Weir, C.J., 2005. Language testing and validation : an evidence-based approach, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zahedi, K. & Shamsaee, S., 2012. Viability of construct validity of the speaking modules of international language examinations (IELTS vs. TOEFL iBT): evidence from Iranian test-takers. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(3), pp.263–277.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chenxi Yin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
