Teaching Model of International Chinese Education from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural Communication

Authors

  • Haiyu Zhan School of Literature and Journalism, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2024.06(09).16

Keywords:

Cross-Cultural Communication, International Chinese Education, Teaching Model

Abstract

The essence of international Chinese education is the teaching, promotion and dissemination of Chinese language and culture, while the differences between Chinese and foreign cultures will create certain obstacles to this dissemination process. In order to cope with the challenges brought by cultural differences and make full use of their positive factors, this paper proposes the application strategy of diversified teaching models, including: first, the interpretation teaching model, which helps students establish a deep understanding of Chinese culture by deeply analyzing the cultural connotations behind Chinese language phenomena; second, the cultural collision teaching model, which encourages students to stimulate critical thinking and innovation in the process of comparing the differences between Chinese and foreign cultures; third, the research-based teaching model, which guides students to participate in cultural research and cultivate their independent learning ability and research literacy; fourth, the exemplary teaching model, which allows students to experience and learn the unique charm of Chinese language and culture in practice by showing representative cultural cases.

References

Lai C, Gu M, Hu J. Understanding legitimate teacher authority in a cross-cultural teaching context: pre-service Chinese language teachers undertaking teaching practicum in international schools in Hong Kong [J]. Journal of Education for Teaching, 2015, 41(4): 417-434.

González-Pérez L I, Ramírez-Montoya M S. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review [J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(3): 1493.

R.C. Holub, Reception Theory-A critical introduction, METHUEN, INC. London and New York First Published in 1984.,P.32.

Cheng Shangrong. Clarifying several concepts of curriculum reform and clarifying their significance Curriculum, Textbooks, and Teaching Methods, 2022, 42 (5): 4-10.

Brew A. Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education [J]. Higher education research & development, 2012, 31(1): 101-114.

Sesmiarni Z. Brain based teaching model as transformation of learning paradigm in higher education [J]. Al-Ta lim Journal, 2015, 22(3): 266-275.

Stanley M J C, Dougherty J P. A paradigm shift in nursing education: A new model [J]. Nursing education perspectives, 2010, 31(6): 378-380.

Han S J, Ransom K J, Perfors A, et al. Inductive reasoning in humans and large language models [J]. Cognitive Systems Research, 2024, 83: 101155.

Lin Shifeng Efficient Strategies for Breaking Through Bottlenecks in "Exemplary" Writing Teaching [J] Teacher Training for Primary and Secondary Schools, 2020 (1): 51-54.

Zhong Lijia, Sheng Qunli Integrated Teaching Design: Analysis and Construction of Multiple Models [J] China Electronic Education, 2024 (7): 35-45.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

Zhan, H. (2024). Teaching Model of International Chinese Education from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural Communication. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 6(9), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2024.06(09).16