The Impact of Shadow Education Governance Policy on Education Equity in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2024.06(08).20Keywords:
Shadow education, Private tutoring, Government policy, Education EquityAbstract
China has successfully implemented nine-year compulsory education aiming for raising the overall education level and equalizing education opportunities. However, the efforts done by the China have been undermined by the rapid expansion of shadow education to some extent. Predominantly utilized by affluent families to boost their children's chances of entering prestigious universities, shadow education has shifted the competition for educational resources away from schools and into private tutoring, thereby exacerbating inequality. In response, the China has introduced various policies aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of shadow education on educational equity. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of these policies using the ecology of equity framework, focusing on the historical period before the measures that were introduced in 2021. The goal is to shed light on the effectiveness of past efforts and provide insights that can guide future development. The findings suggest that while regulations are necessary, policy interventions alone are insufficient to fundamentally alter the status quo in shadow education. A more holistic approach that addresses family, economic, and societal influences is required to achieve meaningful improvements in education equity.
References
Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S. and West, M. (2012). Making schools effective for all: rethinking the task. School leadership & management, 32(3), pp.197-213.
Archer, P. (2001). Public spending on education, inequality and poverty, in S. Cantillon, C. Corrigan, P. Kirby and J. O’Flynn (eds) Rich and Poor: Perspectives on Tackling Inequality in Ireland, Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Guo, S. B. and Guo, Y (2012). Introduction: Teaching under China’s Market Economy: Emerging Issues and Challenges. Canadian and international education, 41(2), p.1-14.
Hao, F. (2019). GOVERNMENTALITY AND PRIVATE TUTORING IN CHINA. Knowledge cultures, 7(1), pp.24-29.
Li, C.C. (2019). FOUCAULDIAN PERSPECTIVE: EXPLORING GOVERNMENTALITY AND THE SELF-DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA’S SHADOW EDUCATION SECTOR. Knowledge cultures, 7(1), pp.30-35.
Liu, F. (2016). The Rise of the ‘Priceless’ Child in China. Comparative education review, 60(1), pp.105-130.
Liu, J. and Bray, M. (2017). Determinants of demand for private supplementary tutoring in China: findings from a national survey. Education economics, 25(2), pp.205-218.
Luan, X., Eacott, S. and Vass, G. (2020). Supplementary no more: a relational analysis of supplementary education in China. Journal of educational administration and history, 52(4), pp.373-384.
Lynch, K. and Lodge, A. (2002). Equality and power in schools: redistribution, recognition, and representation. London;: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ministry of Education (2000), Urgent Notice on Reducing the Heavy Study Load on Students. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_364/moe_369/ moe_373/tnull_4471. html (Accessed: 10 July 2021).
Ministry of Education (2015), Absolute Prohibition of Primary and Secondary Schools and In-service Teachers from Providing Private Tutoring. Available at: http:// www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7002/201507/t20150706_192618.html (Accessed: 10 July 2021).
Ministry of Education (2018), Rectify Out-of-school Training Institutions in Order to Reduce extracurricular Study Load on Primary and lower-secondary Students. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/ s3321 /201802/t20180226_327752.html (Accessed: 10 July 2021).
OECD. (2007). No more failures: ten steps to equity in education. Paris: OECD.
Rose, P. (2015). Three lessons for educational quality in post-2015 goals and targets: Clarity, measurability and equity. International journal of educational development, 40, pp.289-296.
Shavit, Y. and Park, H. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Education as a positional good. Research in social stratification and mobility, 43, pp.1-3.
Tawney, R.H. (1964). Equality, London: Allen and Unwin.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York.
Unterhalter, E. (2009). ‘What is equity in education? Reflections from the capability approach’, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(5), pp. 415-424.
Wang, L. and Hamid, M.O. (2024). The transformation of neoliberalism: A critical analysis of shadow education governance policy in China. International journal of educational research, 127, pp.1-11.
Wei, Y. (2018), The 2017 Chinese Family Survey of Educational Expenditure: August 3 2018. Available at: http://ciefr.pku.edu.cn/cbw/kyjb/2018/03/kyjb_5257.shtml (Accessed: 10 July 2021).
Ye, H. (2015). Key-Point Schools and Entry into Tertiary Education in China. Chinese sociological review, 47(2), pp.128-153.
Yu, Z.Q., Zhu, N. and Baležentis, T. (2017). Impact of public education and regional economic growth in China: A shadow-price perspective. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 9(8), pp.1-10.
Zhang, N. (2007). Education and Social Change in China: Inequality in a Market Economy. Gerard Postiglione. The China journal (Canberra, A.C.T.), 58, pp.162-164.
Zhang, W. (2014). The demand for shadow education in China: mainstream teachers and power relations. Asia Pacific journal of education, 34(4), pp.436-454.
Zhang, W. (2020). Shadow education in the service of tiger parenting: Strategies used by middle‐class families in China. European journal of education, 55(3), pp.388-404.
Zhang, W. and Bray, M. (2018). Equalising schooling, unequalising private supplementary tutoring: access and tracking through shadow education in China. Oxford review of education, 44(2), pp.221-238.
Zhang, W. and Bray, M. (2021). A changing environment of urban education: historical and spatial analysis of private supplementary tutoring in China. Environment and urbanization, 33(1), pp.43-62.
Zhang, W. and Yamato, Y. (2018). Shadow education in East Asia: Entrenched but evolving private supplementary tutoring. In Routledge International Handbook of Schools and Schooling in Asia. Routledge, pp. 323-332.
Zhao, G. (2015). Can money ‘buy’ schooling achievement? Evidence from 19 Chinese cities. China economic review, 35, pp.83-104.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gengshuo Niu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
