Strengthening the Practical Path of Sensory Education in Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Universities—Based on Marcuse's New Theory of Sensibility

Authors

  • Pengpeng Zhang Liaoning University of International Business and Economics School of Marxism, Dalian, Liaoning 116052, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2024.06(08).19

Keywords:

College Ideological and Political Theory Course, Innovate, Practice

Abstract

This article deeply analyzes how Marcuse's theory of new sensibility sharply criticizes the shackles of instrumental rationality in modern industrial society, emphasizing that new sensibility, as a product of the harmonious coexistence of sensibility and rationality, has the power to awaken human inner negation consciousness, resist the alienation of instrumental rationality, and lead us towards the other shore of human liberation and freedom. On this basis, the importance of strengthening emotional education in ideological and political theory courses is studied, and it is proposed to enhance students' emotional abilities, empathy, critical thinking, and social responsibility through diversified course content, innovative teaching methods, the combination of practical teaching and emotional experience, and the reform of evaluation systems, in order to cultivate well-rounded young people in the new era.

References

Yang Xiaolian. On Marcuse's "New Sensibility" [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 1999, (3):128-133.

Tan Rongpei, Liu Yongsheng. Thoughts on the Nature of Life and Aesthetic Existence: Marcuse's New Sensory Essence[J]. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University,2008,(2):121-126.

Douglas Kellner. Marxism, Revolution and Utopia: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse (Volume 6). [M]. Routledge. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-28

How to Cite

Zhang, P. (2024). Strengthening the Practical Path of Sensory Education in Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Universities—Based on Marcuse’s New Theory of Sensibility. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 6(8), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2024.06(08).19