Comparison and Analysis of Student Behavior Recognition Methods in University Classrooms

Authors

  • Liqiong Lu School of Computer Science and Intelligence Education, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Development and Education for Special Needs Children, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China
  • Lingyue Hu College of Big Data and Computer Science, Guangdong Baiyun University, Guangzhou 510450, China
  • Qin Lei School of Mathematics and Statistics, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China
  • Dong Wu School of Computer Science and Intelligence Education, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Development and Education for Special Needs Children, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China
  • Yongheng Chen School of Computer Science and Intelligence Education, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China
  • Tonglai Liu College of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, 510225, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2025.07(08).12

Keywords:

Student behavior recognition, University Classroom, CNN

Abstract

Student behavior intelligence recognition is a very important component of intelligent evaluation in university classrooms. Firstly, 1000 images containing various types of student behaviors in university classrooms were collected to construct a student behavior recognition dataset. These student behaviors include listen, read, write, bow, lie, yawn, drink, play, glance and trick. Then, classic CNN object recognition methods including SSD, Faster RCNN, YOLOV8, YOLOV11 and YOLOV12 were used to recognize student behaviors in university classrooms on the above dataset and the recognition performance of different methods was compared and analyzed. The experimental results show that YOLOV12 has the best student behavior recognition performance, with an mAP value of 0.521 and YOLO V11 has the fastest inference speed and the second highest recognition performance with an mAP value of 0.519.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

How to Cite

Lu, L., Hu, L., Lei, Q., Wu, D., Chen, Y., & Liu, T. (2025). Comparison and Analysis of Student Behavior Recognition Methods in University Classrooms. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 7(8), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2025.07(08).12

Issue

Section

Articles