A Case Study on the Multimodal Coordinated Relationship of Teacher Scaffolding in a Content and Language Integrated Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2025.07(01).09Keywords:
Teacher Scaffolding, Multimodality, Meaning Coordination, Content and Language IntegrationAbstract
This study uses a teaching video of a Content and Language Integrated (CLI) comprehensive English course, which is taught by an English major teacher in a certain university, as the corpus. The video is 80 minutes in length. Based on the constructed Framework of Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis, it explores the application of teacher scaffolding, its multimodal characteristics, and how various modalities coordinate with scaffolding language to construct meaning. The research findings are as follows: (1) In the CLI classroom, the teacher employed a diverse range of teaching scaffolding to help students, mainly including reinforcing key information, guiding self-correction, bridging information gaps, and simplifying tasks; additionally, most of the teacher scaffolding activities are targeted at content, followed by language. (2) Teacher scaffolding exhibits distinct multimodal characteristics. The teacher predominantly uses falling tones, and frequently employs intonation nuclei to emphasize key points. Gestures mainly consist of stress gestures and symbolic gestures that help convey complex concepts. The teacher often moves around in the classroom space, and her eye movements mainly involve scanning the entire class; there are certain differences in the multimodal characteristics of the scaffolding used by the teacher when focusing on different aspects. (3) The various modalities of teacher scaffolding coordinate with scaffolding language to jointly construct the ideational meaning, interpersonal meaning, and textual meaning of teacher scaffolding. They often form a complementary and reinforcing relationship (primary-secondary and expansion) with scaffolding language. This study aims to provide some insights for CLI teachers on how to construct teacher scaffolding and achieve effective classroom teaching.
References
Enyew, C., A. Yigzaw. ＆ M. Muche. 2015. Effects of teacher scaffolding on students’ oral reading fluency[J]. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4(4): 200-207.
Gregersen, T. G. &J.S. 0liverse-Cuhat. 2009. An examination of L1 and L2 gesture use: What role does proficiency play[J]. The Modern Language Journal, (9):195-208.
Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
Hood, S. E. 2011. Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning[A]. In E. A. Thompson, M. Stenglin & S. Dreyfus(eds.). Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities[C]. London: Continuum, 31-52
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. 1996. Reading Images - The Grammar of Visual Design[M]. London: Routledge.
Lim, F. V. 2017. Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis approach[J]. Social Semiotics, (1): 83-111.
Martinec, R. 2004. Gestures that co-occur with speech as a systematic resource: The realization of experiential meanings in indexes[J]. Social Semiotics, (2): 193-213.
Maybin, J., N. Mercer & B. Stierer. 1992. Scaffolding learning in the classroom[A]. InK. Norman (ed.). Thinking Voices: The Work of The National Oracy Project[C]. London: Hodder and Stoughton.186-195.
Meyer D K ＆ Turner J C. 2002. Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation [J]. Educational Psychologist, 37(1): 17-25.
Muhonen H et al. 2016. Scaffolding through dialogic teaching in early school classrooms [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, (55): 143-154.
Mulatsih S. 2011. The use of scaffolding technique to improve the students’ competence in writing genre-based texts [J]. Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 2(1): 101-109.
O’Toole, M. The Language of Displayed Art[M]. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1994.
Palincsar, A. S. ＆ A. L. Brown. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2): 117-175.
Radford, J., Ireson, J., & Mahon, M. (2012). The organization of repair in SSLD classroom discourse: How to expose the trouble-source. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3(2), 171-193.
Stone, C. A. 1998. The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities[J]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4): 344-364.
Talebinejad, M. R. & F. Akhgar. 2015. The impact of teacher scaffolding on Iranian intermediate EFL learner’s listening comprehension achievement[J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5): 1101-1105.
van de Pol, J., M. Volman. & J. Beishuizen. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research[J]. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3): 271-296.
Wischgoll A, Pauli C ＆ Ｒeusser K. 2015. Scaffolding — How can contingency lead to successful learning when dealing with errors? [J]. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7): 1147-1159.
Wood, D., J. S. Bruner & G. Ross. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving[J]. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17: 89-100.
Chang Junyue, Zhao Yongqing. 2020. The proposal, connotation and significance of the concept of content-language integrated education (CLI) - from content-based teaching to content-language integrated education[J]. Foreign Language Teaching, (5): 49-54.
Chang, J.Y. 2020. Curriculum system and teaching reform of English major based on the concept of content-language integration education[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Du, X.S. & Zhang, L. (2022). The scaffolding effect of teacher discourse on students’ thinking development in foreign language classroom interaction[J]. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 44 (05): 101-118.
Gu Yuguo. 2007. Analysis of multimedia and multimodal learning[J]. Foreign Language Audiovisual Teaching, (02): 3-12.
Guo Hongwei, Yang Xueyan. 2020. A study on the intersemiotic relationship between teacher metadiscourse and sign language from a multimodal perspective[J]. Foreign Language Teaching, 41(04): 52-57.
Hu Zhuanglin. 2007. Multimodality in social semiotics research[J]. Language Teaching and Research, (01): 1-10.
Li Danli. 2012. The construction of teacher “scaffolding” in interactive discourse in second language classroom[J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 44 (04): 572-584+641.
Li Youliang. 2010. Research on the application of “scaffolding theory” in “zero-class” college English oral teaching[J]. Foreign Languages, 26(02):127-129.
Li Zhanzi. 2003. Social semiotic analysis of multimodal discourse[J]. Foreign Language Research, (5): 1-8
Lv Jing, Yang Min. 2020. Research on the effectiveness of scaffolding teaching in college English reading teaching[J]. China Higher Education, (19): 45-46.
Peng Yanghua, Zhou Ping. 2011. Research on the application of scaffolding teaching in higher vocational English teaching[J]. Foreign Languages, 27(S1): 134-136.
Qin Xiaoyi. 2007. Research on the characteristics of English speech information transmission of stress, rhythm and intonation[J]. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities and Social Sciences), (01): 94-99.
Sun Xin, Wang Pingping, Hong Yani. 2021. A multimodal study of teacher scaffolding in content-language integrated classrooms[J]. Foreign Languages in China, 18(01):63-71.
Sun Xin, Zhang Dan. 2018. An empirical study on the use of gestures by Chinese learners of different English proficiency levels[J]. Modern Foreign Languages, (6):829-839.
Sun X, Zhou X. 2022. Research on teachers’ hyperlinguistic behavior in content-language integrated classrooms[J]. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 5 (04): 69-76+94.
Shegrove, J. 2013. Sequential Organization in Dialogue[M]. Translated by Ma Wen, Ji Yunxia, Sun Xiaohong, et al. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Xu Jinfen, Chen Ziyi. 2022. A review of research on teacher scaffolding in domestic classroom teaching (2006-2020) [J]. Language Education, 10 (01): 11-19.
Yang XZ. 2009. Multimodal discourse analysis and systemic functional linguistics[J]. Foreign Language Teaching, 30(04): 11-14.
Ying Jieqiong, Xie Chaoqun. 2024. A study on the synergy between scaffolding language and the meaning of gestures, body postures and facial expressions in English teaching[J]. Foreign Languages in China, 21(02):58-66.
James Martin, Michelle Zappavinia, Wu Qijing, et al. 2018. Research on paralinguistic meaning: A systemic functional linguistics perspective[J]. Contemporary Rhetoric, (01): 2-33.
Zhang Delu. 2009. Exploration of a comprehensive theoretical framework for multimodal discourse analysis[J]. Foreign Languages in China, 6 (01): 24-30.
Zhang Delu. 2015. Multimodal discourse analysis theory and foreign language teaching[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Zhao Nisha. 2012. A study on teachers’ questions in English major classrooms based on the perspective of “scaffolding” [J]. Foreign Languages, 28 (05): 133-139.
Zhu Yongsheng. 2007. Theoretical basis and research methods of multimodal discourse analysis[J]. Foreign Language Journal, (05): 82-86.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shuqi Liu, Xiuyan Zhao, Xin Sun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
